Normal View Dyslexic View

Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

Mohamed AH, Howitt A, Rae S, Cai PL, Hitchman L, Wallace T et al.

Br J Surg 2024; 111: znae195.

Some 206 of the original 280 patients were available for analysis. Both procedures resulted in durable improvements in disease-specific quality of life (P<0.001). Clinical recurrence was lower after endothermal ablation: 37 versus 59 per cent, P=0.005.

Comment: Endothermal ablation has real long term advantages.

BJS Foundation Limited
BJS Academy
0000-0000
BJS Foundation Limited
London, UK

Related articles


Covered versus bare-metal stenting of the mesenteric arteries in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CoBaGI): a multicentre, patient-blinded and investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Terlouw LG, van Dijk LJD, van Noord D, Bakker OJ, Bijdevaate DC, Erler NS et al, on behalf of the Dutch Mesenteric Ischemia Study Group.

16 August 2024

Effect of anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks vs 3 months on recurrence and bleeding events in patients younger than 21 years of age with provoked venous thromboembolism. The Kids-DOTT randomized clinical trial.

Goldenberg NA, Kittelson JM, Abshire TC, Bonaca M, Casella JF, Dale RA et al, for the Kids-DOTT Trial investigators and the ATLAS Group.
JAMA 2022; 327: 129-137.

1 February 2022

Extended-course antibiotic prophylaxis in lower limb amputation: randomized clinical trial.

Souroullas P, Barnes R, Carradice D, Smith G, Huang C, Chetter I.

2 May 2022
Copied!